Abstract
The selection between knotted and knotless netting presents a foundational decision for applications spanning sports, agriculture, construction, and logistics. This choice hinges on a nuanced understanding of their distinct manufacturing processes and resultant physical properties. Knotted netting, produced by interlocking twines with knots, offers notable abrasion resistance and traditional strength, though the knots themselves can become stress concentration points and sites of premature wear. Conversely, knotless netting, created through a woven or knitted process, provides a smoother surface, more uniform stress distribution, and a superior strength-to-weight ratio. The determination of which type is appropriate involves a comprehensive evaluation of factors including tensile strength requirements, potential for abrasion, safety considerations for people or delicate goods, environmental exposure, and overall economic value. An analysis of these trade-offs reveals that the optimal solution is not universal but is instead highly contingent upon the specific functional and financial demands of the intended application, a central theme in the debate of knotted vs. knotless netting: which is right for your application?.
Key Takeaways
- Knotted netting offers superior abrasion resistance, making it ideal for rugged, high-friction uses.
- Knotless netting provides a smooth, uniform surface that is safer for people and gentler on delicate goods.
- The strength-to-weight ratio is generally higher in knotless netting due to its efficient, woven construction.
- Consider the total cost of ownership; knotless may have a higher initial price but a longer functional lifespan.
- Resolving the knotted vs. knotless netting: which is right for your application? dilemma requires a project-specific analysis.
- The knotless design often yields a more consistent mesh size and a cleaner aesthetic appearance.
-
Material choice, such as nylon or polyester, significantly influences the performance of either netting type.
1. Structural Integrity and Strength: A Tale of Two Constructions
When we approach the question of netting, it is easy to see it as a simple mesh, a barrier of intersecting lines. Yet, the method of intersection—the very heart of its construction—creates two fundamentally different products. Understanding this distinction is the first and most significant step in navigating the choice between knotted and knotless netting. It is a choice between a structure built on focused points of strength and one built on integrated, uniform cohesion. Let us explore the mechanics of each to appreciate how their form dictates their function.
The Mechanics of Knotted Netting: Traditional Strength
Imagine the simple, profound technology of a knot. For millennia, knots have been used to join ropes, secure loads, and form the very fabric of fishing nets that have sustained civilizations (Wong & McGrouther, 2023). Knotted netting inherits this legacy. It is manufactured by machines that systematically tie individual twines together, most often using a sheet bend knot, at every intersection of the mesh.
This process creates a structure with a distinct character. The knots themselves are dense concentrations of material, making them highly resistant to abrasion. When a baseball scuffs against a backstop or a pallet scrapes against a cargo net, the knot bears the brunt of the impact, protecting the integrity of the adjoining twines. This is the traditional virtue of knotted netting: its ruggedness.
However, this very feature introduces a point of complexity. In engineering, sharp corners and abrupt changes in geometry are known as stress concentrators. A knot is precisely that. The forces applied to the net are not distributed evenly; they are channeled through these intersections. While the knot is strong, it is also the point where failure is most likely to initiate under extreme load. The security of the knot itself becomes a variable, influenced by the material, the type of knot, and the conditions of use, a concept extensively studied in fields as diverse as surgery and mountaineering (Bushong & Janis, 2024).
The Innovation of Knotless Netting: Uniformity and Efficiency
Knotless netting represents a more modern approach to textile engineering. Instead of tying twines together, it is created through a weaving or knitting process, much like the fabric of a sweater. The twines are interlaced, forming a continuous material without the concentrated mass of a knot.
The immediate consequence of this construction is uniformity. When a force is applied to knotless netting, the stress is distributed more evenly across the entire structure. There are no inherent stress concentration points. This efficient distribution of load means that, for a given weight of material, knotless netting can often achieve a higher overall breaking strength. It is a system where every fiber contributes more equally to the collective strength.
This uniform structure also results in a lighter product. Without the extra material required to form thousands of knots, a panel of knotless netting is inherently less bulky than its knotted counterpart of the same twine diameter. This reduction in weight has significant practical implications for installation, handling, and the structural support required to hang the net.
Comparative Strength Analysis in Real-World Scenarios
The theoretical differences in construction translate directly into practical performance. The choice is not about which is stronger in an absolute sense, but which type of strength is best suited for the task at hand. Let us consider two contrasting scenarios to illuminate this.
For a heavy-duty construction debris net on a high-rise building, the primary concern is containing large, potentially sharp objects with high kinetic energy. Here, the abrasion resistance and rugged feel of knotted netting can be an advantage. The knots can help to grip and hold material, and their inherent toughness is well-suited to the harsh environment of a job site.
Conversely, for an indoor soccer facility\’s ceiling protection net, the priorities are different. The impacts are frequent but less abrasive. A lighter-weight net is easier and safer to install overhead. Most importantly, a uniform, high breaking strength is needed to handle the collective force of repeated ball strikes without catastrophic failure. In this case, the superior strength-to-weight ratio and uniform stress distribution of knotless netting make it a more logical and efficient choice.
To formalize this comparison, we can examine their properties side-by-side.
| Feature | Knotted Netting | Knotless Netting |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing Process | Twines are tied together with knots (e.g., sheet bend). | Twines are woven or knitted together without knots. |
| Stress Distribution | Concentrated at the knots. | Evenly distributed across the structure. |
| Abrasion Resistance | Excellent; knots provide a durable, raised wear surface. | Good; but the smooth twine is more exposed to friction. |
| Strength-to-Weight Ratio | Lower; knots add significant weight without proportional strength. | Higher; efficient use of material leads to a lighter, stronger product. |
| Mesh Consistency | Good; but knots can slightly distort mesh geometry under load. | Excellent; mesh shape is stable and uniform. |
| Common Failure Point | Knot slippage or failure at the stress point of the knot. | Tearing of the twine itself under excessive load. |
This table clarifies that the decision is a trade-off. One must weigh the need for rugged, abrasion-resistant focal points against the desire for lightweight, uniform, and efficient tensile strength.
2. Durability and Lifespan: Weathering the Elements
A net\’s value is not measured solely on the day it is installed, but over the years of service it provides. Its durability—the ability to resist wear, environmental degradation, and fatigue—is a critical factor in its long-term economic and functional success. The structural differences between knotted and knotless netting profoundly influence how they age and endure the challenges of their environment.
Abrasion and Wear: The Impact of Knots
As we have established, the knots in knotted netting are its primary defense against abrasion. They act as sacrificial wear points. Think of them as the thick tread on a tire. In applications with constant friction, such as a trawling net dragging along the seabed or a cargo net securing shifting boxes on a truck, this is a significant advantage. The knots can endure a great deal of rubbing and scraping before the integrity of the core twines is compromised.
However, this strength is also a potential weakness. Because the knots are raised, they are also the first and primary points of contact. All the wear is focused on these small areas. Over time, a knot can be abraded to the point of failure, causing an entire mesh intersection to break. While field repairs are often possible by simply re-tying a section, the concentration of wear means that the net\’s lifespan is often dictated by the lifespan of its knots.
Knotless netting, with its smooth, flat profile, presents a different wear pattern. There are no raised points to concentrate abrasion. Instead, any friction is distributed over a larger surface area of the twines themselves. This can be a disadvantage in intensely abrasive situations, as the core twines are more directly exposed. Yet, in applications with less direct friction, such as a stationary sports barrier or a shade cloth, this even wear pattern can lead to a more graceful and predictable aging process, without the sudden failure of a single, worn-out knot.
UV and Environmental Degradation
For any netting used outdoors, the sun is a relentless adversary. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation breaks down the polymer chains that give synthetic fibers their strength. Both knotted and knotless netting are typically manufactured from UV-stabilized materials and can be treated with additional protective coatings. However, their physical structure can influence their susceptibility.
The complex, dense structure of a knot can, in some cases, trap moisture, dirt, and organic matter like pollen or algae spores. This retained dampness can accelerate material degradation and promote the growth of mold or mildew, which can weaken fibers. In contrast, the smoother, more open structure of knotless netting tends to shed water and debris more effectively. This can be particularly relevant in agricultural or marine settings, where exposure to moisture and biological agents is constant. A cleaner net is often a more durable net. Research into biodegradable gillnets, for instance, highlights how material composition and structure interact to determine environmental persistence and performance (Le Gué et al., 2024).
Material Choices and Their Influence on Longevity
The choice between knotted and knotless is only part of the durability equation; the material itself is just as vital. The same construction will yield vastly different results depending on the polymer used.
- Nylon (Polyamide): This is a workhorse material, known for its exceptional strength, elasticity, and shock absorption. It is an excellent choice for applications involving sudden loads, like fall safety nets. However, nylon absorbs water, which can cause it to lose up to 15% of its strength when wet and leads to expansion and contraction. This makes it less ideal for permanent outdoor installations where dimensional stability is key.
- Polyester (PET): Polyester is the material of choice for many outdoor applications. It boasts excellent UV resistance, low stretch, and high strength. Critically, it absorbs very little water, so its properties remain stable in wet or humid conditions. This makes it a superior option for permanent perimeter nets, stadium backstops, and agricultural enclosures.
- Polyethylene (PE): Lighter than water, polyethylene floats and is highly resistant to chemicals and moisture. It is not as strong as nylon or polyester, but its durability in wet environments makes it a common choice for aquaculture cages, fishing nets, and marine debris booms.
- High-Performance Fibers (HMPE/Dyneema): For applications demanding the absolute highest strength-to-weight ratio, materials like High-Modulus Polyethylene (often known by brand names like Dyneema® or Spectra®) are used. These fibers are incredibly strong, lightweight, and resistant to abrasion and UV light. They are most often used in knotless constructions to maximize their performance advantages, creating premium netting for high-stakes applications like professional sports stadiums or aerospace component containment.
Ultimately, the durability of a netting system is a synergy between its construction (knotted or knotless) and its material composition. A polyester knotless net will outlast a non-UV-treated nylon knotted net in the sun, just as a heavy-gauge knotted nylon net will out-endure a fine-gauge knotless polyester net used for heavy-duty cargo.
3. Safety and Application Suitability: Protecting People and Products
Beyond strength and durability, the most humane and practical consideration in selecting a netting system is its interaction with the world around it. Does it protect or pose a risk? Is it gentle or abrasive? The physical form of knotted and knotless netting gives them distinct personalities, making each uniquely suited to different roles. The question of knotted vs. knotless netting: which is right for your application? often finds its clearest answer in the context of safety.
The Smooth Surface Advantage of Knotless Netting
The defining characteristic of knotless netting is its smooth, non-abrasive surface. The absence of knots creates a flat plane that is significantly gentler on contact. This property is not a minor detail; it is a critical safety and performance feature in a wide range of applications.
Consider a children\’s indoor play area. A child tumbling into a knotted safety net could suffer scrapes and friction burns from the raised knots. A knotless net, by contrast, provides a softer, safer barrier that cushions the fall without causing surface injury. The same principle applies in sports. A soccer player sliding into a knotless goal net is far less likely to be abraded than one sliding into a traditional knotted version.
This gentleness extends from people to products. In agriculture, knotless bird netting is preferred for protecting valuable fruit crops like cherries or blueberries. The smooth surface will not bruise or damage the delicate fruit upon contact, preserving the marketable quality of the harvest. In aquaculture, knotless nets are increasingly the standard for containment pens. They are less abrasive to the skin and scales of fish, reducing stress, injury, and the risk of secondary infections, leading to a healthier and more viable stock. Similarly, when transporting finished goods with sensitive surfaces, like furniture or painted components, a custom cargo netting solution made from knotless material prevents scratches and damage during transit.
Knotted Netting\’s Role in High-Impact Containment
While knotless netting excels in gentle containment, the rugged, three-dimensional structure of knotted netting gives it an advantage in certain heavy-duty scenarios. In construction, for example, a heavy-gauge knotted debris net is often specified. The knots provide extra bulk and a less uniform surface, which can be effective at catching and arresting the fall of irregular objects like tools, bricks, or pieces of concrete. The knots can create purchase, preventing objects from sliding or rolling as easily as they might on a smoother surface.
This same logic applies to some forms of heavy cargo control. When securing an uneven load of raw materials, like logs or scrap metal, the texture of a knotted net can help to grip the load and prevent shifting. The inherent rigidity and focused strength points of the knotted structure can provide a sense of security and stability in these aggressive, high-friction environments.
Application-Specific Recommendations
The optimal choice is deeply contextual. There is no single best type of netting, only the best type for a specific job. The following table provides a general framework for making this decision across various sectors.
| Application Category | Recommended Netting Type | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Professional Sports | Knotless (e.g., Golf, Tennis, Soccer) | Smooth surface for player safety, professional aesthetics, and consistent ball rebound. |
| Heavy-Impact Sports | Knotted (e.g., Baseball/Softball Backstops) | Superior abrasion resistance against constant, high-velocity ball impacts. |
| Agriculture (Fruit Protection) | Knotless | Prevents bruising and damage to delicate produce. |
| Aquaculture (Fish Pens) | Knotless | Reduces stress and physical injury to fish stock. |
| Construction (Debris/Safety) | Knotted | Excellent for containing heavy, irregular, and abrasive materials. Rugged and durable. |
| General Cargo & Logistics | Varies: Knotless for finished goods, Knotted for raw materials. | Choice depends on the need to protect surfaces versus the need to grip irregular loads. |
| Playgrounds & Amusement Parks | Knotless | Critical for ensuring the safety of the public, especially children, by preventing scrapes. |
| Home & Garden (Pest Control) | Knotless | Lightweight, easy to handle, and effective without being abrasive to plants. |
As the table illustrates, the debate over knotted vs. knotless netting is resolved by analyzing the primary function. Is the goal to protect a person from the net, a product from the net, or the net from the product? Answering this question will almost always point toward the correct solution.
4. Economic Considerations: Cost vs. Long-Term Value
A responsible decision in any project, whether commercial or private, must account for the economic implications. The choice between knotted and knotless netting is no exception. While it is tempting to focus solely on the initial purchase price, a more sophisticated analysis considers the total cost of ownership over the netting\’s entire lifecycle. This includes the initial outlay, installation expenses, maintenance requirements, and the expected lifespan of the product.
Initial Purchase Price: A Clear Distinction
Generally speaking, knotted netting is the more economical option upfront. The technology for producing knotted netting is older, more widespread, and the machinery is less complex than that required for modern knotless weaving. This established manufacturing base often translates to a lower cost per square foot, especially for standard materials like polyethylene or nylon. For projects with a tight initial budget where the application is forgiving—such as a temporary garden fence or a simple utility barrier—the lower entry cost of knotted netting can be a compelling factor.
Knotless netting, particularly that made from high-performance materials like polyester or HMPE, typically carries a higher initial purchase price. The weaving and knitting machines are more technologically advanced and operate with greater precision. This process, which yields the benefits of a higher strength-to-weight ratio and uniform construction, requires a greater capital investment from the manufacturer, a cost that is reflected in the final price. This higher price point can be a barrier for some, but it is essential to view it not as a simple expense, but as an investment.
Installation and Maintenance Costs
The economic calculation begins to shift when we consider the costs beyond the initial purchase. Knotless netting is, as a rule, lighter than a knotted net of equivalent strength. This weight reduction can have a cascading effect on installation costs. A lighter net may require a less robust support structure—fewer or smaller poles, and lighter-gauge cable. It is also easier for a crew to handle and install, potentially reducing labor hours and the need for heavy lifting equipment. Over the expanse of a large project, such as outfitting an entire sports complex or an agricultural field, these savings can be substantial.
Maintenance and repair also present a trade-off. Knotted netting has a perceived advantage in field repairability. A break can often be fixed by a skilled hand with a spare piece of twine, re-tying the damaged section. This can be a practical benefit in remote locations or in applications like fishing where nets are constantly being managed.
However, the failure mode of knotted netting—concentrated wear on the knots—can lead to more frequent repair needs. Knotless netting, with its more even wear pattern, may last longer before needing any intervention. When a repair is needed on knotless netting, it can sometimes be more complex, occasionally requiring a patch to be stitched in or even the replacement of a full panel. The key consideration is the frequency versus the complexity of repair. A net that rarely fails but requires a more involved repair may ultimately be more economical than a net that is easily fixed but requires constant attention.
Calculating the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
The most insightful economic analysis centers on the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO). This concept amortizes the total investment over the expected functional lifespan of the netting. A simple formula might look like:
TCO = (Initial Cost + Installation Cost + Estimated Lifetime Maintenance Costs) / Expected Lifespan in Years
Let\’s imagine a scenario. A coastal golf driving range is installing a 30-foot high barrier net.
- Option A: Knotted Nylon Netting. Lower initial cost. However, its propensity to absorb water and stretch requires a heavier-duty support structure. Its lower UV resistance compared to polyester means it will likely need replacement in 5-7 years.
- Option B: Knotless Polyester Netting. Higher initial cost. Its lighter weight allows for a less expensive support structure. Its superior UV and moisture resistance give it an expected lifespan of 10-12 years.
Even if Option B costs 30% more upfront, its longer lifespan and potential savings on installation could result in a significantly lower TCO. The higher initial investment delivers greater long-term value. This calculation demonstrates that the cheapest option is not always the least expensive one. The decision becomes a strategic one about balancing short-term budgets with long-term performance and reliability.
5. Customization and Aesthetics: Tailoring the Net to the Need
In many modern applications, a net is not just a functional barrier; it is also a component of a larger design. Its appearance, consistency, and ability to be tailored to precise specifications are increasingly important. The manufacturing methods of knotted and knotless netting give each a distinct visual character and different capabilities for customization, factors that can be decisive in architectural, commercial, and high-end residential projects.
Mesh Size and Shape Consistency
The precision of the weaving process used for knotless netting results in exceptionally consistent mesh geometry. Each diamond or square in the mesh is virtually identical in size and shape. This uniformity is critical in regulated applications. For example, in competitive sports like tennis or volleyball, the net\’s mesh must be consistent to ensure fair play and prevent the ball from passing through. In aquaculture, a consistent mesh size is paramount for containing fish of a certain age while allowing adequate water flow.
Knotted netting, while generally consistent, is subject to minor variations. The knot itself occupies space and can slightly distort the four adjoining mesh openings. When the net is placed under tension, these knots can shift or tighten, leading to small changes in the mesh geometry. While this is irrelevant for many bulk applications like hay bale nets or construction debris containment, it can be a disqualifying factor where absolute precision is required. The choice here is between the practical consistency of knotted netting and the engineered precision of knotless netting.
Visual Impact and Professional Appearance
The aesthetic difference between the two types is striking and should not be underestimated. Knotted netting has a traditional, rugged, and visible presence. The grid of knots creates a classic, heavy-duty look that can be desirable in industrial, maritime, or rustic settings. It looks strong and functional because it is.
Knotless netting, on the other hand, offers a clean, low-profile, and modern aesthetic. Its smooth, flat surface appears less obtrusive and can almost disappear from a distance, preserving views and creating a more open feel. This makes it the preferred choice for architectural applications, museum exhibits, high-end sports facilities, and residential balconies where the goal is safety without sacrificing visual appeal. For a new pickleball complex or a modern zoo enclosure, the sleek, professional look of knotless netting contributes to a higher-quality visitor experience. The visual noise is lower, allowing the focus to remain on the activity or the view beyond the barrier.
Tailoring Your Solution: The Role of a Custom Manufacturer
Ultimately, the binary choice of knotted vs. knotless is an oversimplification. The true path to an optimal solution lies in complete customization, where the construction type is just one variable among many. The ideal netting is a system designed from the ground up to meet the specific demands of a project.
This is where collaboration with a specialist manufacturer becomes invaluable. An expert can guide you through the matrix of choices:
- Construction: Knotted or knotless?
- Material: Nylon, polyester, polyethylene, or a high-performance fiber?
- Twine Diameter: From thin, lightweight gauges to thick, heavy-duty cords.
- Mesh Size: From tiny insect screens to large debris nets.
- Coatings: Additional treatments for UV resistance, fire retardancy, or color.
- Finishing: Rope borders, vinyl borders with grommets, or other attachments.
By working with a dedicated custom netting manufacturer, you can move beyond off-the-shelf products and develop a solution that is precisely calibrated for your application\’s strength requirements, environmental conditions, safety standards, and aesthetic goals. This collaborative process ensures that the final product is not a compromise, but a purpose-built asset that delivers maximum performance and value.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Is knotless netting always stronger than knotted netting?
Not necessarily in all measures of strength. Knotless netting typically has a higher tensile or breaking strength for its weight because stress is distributed more evenly. However, knotted netting often exhibits superior abrasion resistance because the knots act as durable, raised points that can withstand more friction before the primary twines are damaged. The stronger choice depends on whether the primary challenge is a sudden pulling force or sustained rubbing and wear.
Can knotted netting be repaired more easily?
Yes, in many cases, knotted netting is easier to repair in the field. A break in the mesh can often be fixed by an individual with a length of matching twine and the ability to tie the appropriate knots. This can be a significant advantage in remote or marine applications. Repairing knotless netting can be more complex, sometimes requiring special tools or the stitching of a patch panel.
Which type of netting is better for permanent outdoor use?
For permanent outdoor installations, the material is often more important than the construction type. However, knotless netting made from UV-resistant polyester is generally considered a superior choice. Its smooth surface sheds water and debris more effectively, reducing the risk of rot or mildew, and its dimensional stability is excellent. While knotted polyester is also very durable, the knots can trap moisture and debris over time.
Why is knotless netting often more expensive?
The higher cost of knotless netting stems from its more complex manufacturing process. The specialized weaving or knitting machinery required to produce it is more technologically advanced and represents a greater capital investment than the machines used for tying knotted netting. This, combined with its often higher performance characteristics, contributes to a higher initial purchase price.
How do I choose the right mesh size for my project?
The mesh size, or the dimension of the opening in the net, should be slightly smaller than the smallest object you need to contain. For a golf barrier net, a 1-inch mesh is common to stop a golf ball. For a debris net, the mesh might be much smaller to catch fine particles. For a soccer goal, the mesh can be larger, typically around 4-5 inches. Always identify the smallest object or projectile and select a mesh size that ensures it cannot pass through.
What is the primary safety advantage of knotless netting?
The primary safety advantage is its smooth, non-abrasive surface. This makes it the ideal choice for any application where people, particularly children, might come into direct contact with the net, such as in playgrounds, sports facilities, and amusement parks. It prevents the scrapes, cuts, and friction burns that can be caused by the raised knots of traditional netting.
Does the weight difference between the two types really matter?
Yes, the weight difference is significant. Knotless netting can be up to 30% lighter than knotted netting of a similar break strength. This reduces the dead load on the supporting structure, potentially lowering the cost of poles and hardware. It also makes installation easier, faster, and safer for the installation crew, which can translate to lower labor costs.
Conclusion
The examination of knotted and knotless netting reveals a landscape of nuanced trade-offs rather than a simple hierarchy of quality. The path to an informed decision does not lie in seeking a universally better product, but in cultivating a deep understanding of the specific demands of the application at hand. The traditional, rugged durability of knotted netting, with its exceptional abrasion resistance, remains the stalwart choice for harsh, high-friction environments where brute-force containment is the primary objective. Its value is proven in the demanding worlds of construction and heavy cargo transport.
In contrast, the elegant efficiency of knotless netting speaks to a more modern set of priorities. Its uniform strength, lighter weight, and gentle, non-abrasive surface make it the superior solution where safety, precision, and aesthetic subtlety are paramount. From protecting athletes and children to preserving the quality of delicate agricultural products, its thoughtful design delivers a higher standard of care and performance. The decision-making process must extend beyond initial cost to embrace a holistic view of long-term value, considering installation, maintenance, and functional lifespan. Ultimately, the most successful netting installation will be one that is not merely purchased, but purposefully designed, aligning its fundamental construction—knotted or knotless—with the unique purpose it is meant to serve.
References
Azmat, C. E. (2023). Wound closure techniques. StatPearls Publishing.
Bushong, E. E., & Janis, J. E. (2024). Knot security 101: A comprehensive practical review to optimize performance. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open, 12(8), e6201. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006201
Koninckx, P. R. (2023). Effect of diameter and type of suture on knot and loop security. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(19), 6418. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196418
Le Gué, L., Savina, E., Arhant, M., Davies, P., & Dumergue, N. (2024). Influence of knot strength on the mechanical performance of a biodegradable gillnet. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 15450. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66474-3
NOAA Fisheries. (2024). Guide for identifying gear from marine mammal entanglements in the U.S. West Coast and Alaska. U.S. Department of Commerce.
US Netting. (n.d.). Netting selection guide.
Wong, Y. R., & McGrouther, D. A. (2023). Biomechanics of surgical knot security: A systematic review. International Journal of Surgery, 21(1), e232. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000232
